Projected paediatric cervical spine imaging rates with application of NEXUS, Canadian C-Spine and PECARN clinical decision rules in a prospective Australian cohort
نویسندگان
چکیده
Background Clinical decision rules (CDRs) are commonly used to guide imaging decisions in cervical spine injury (CSI) assessment despite limited evidence for their use paediatric populations. We set out determine CSI incidence, rates and the frequency of previously identified risk factors, thus assess projected impact on if CDRs were strictly applied as a rule our population. Methods A single-centre prospective observational study all aged under 16 years presenting possible tertiary emergency department over year, commencing September 2015. CDR variables from National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) rule, Canadian C-Spine (CCR) proposed Paediatric Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) collected prospectively post hoc. Results 1010 children enrolled; 973 had not received prior imaging. Of these, 40.7% imaging; 32.4% X-rays, 13.4% CT scan 3% MRI. All three five (0.5%) with who If imaging, setting would be follows: NEXUS-44% (95% CI 41% 47.4%), CCR-at least 48.4% 45.3% 51.7%) PECARN-68% 65.1% 71.1 % ). Conclusion CSIs rare (0.5% cohort), however, 40% have been designed decisions; assessed this increase rates. Projected differ considerably depending applied. These findings highlight need validated paediatric-specific CDR.
منابع مشابه
Comparison of the Canadian C-Spine rule and NEXUS decision instrument in evaluating blunt trauma patients for cervical spine injury.
Concerned about missing potentially catastrophic neurologic injury, emergency physicians have typically made liberal use of radiographic imaging to evaluate blunt trauma patients for cervical spine injuries. This practice subjects large numbers of patients to imaging, with its associated cost, time expenditure, and radiation exposure, in order to detect injury in a small minority. Consequently,...
متن کاملThe Canadian C-spine rule safely reduces imaging rates for cervical spine injuries.
Question: Does implementation of the Canadian C-spine rule in emergency departments reduce the proportion of patients referred for diagnostic imaging of the cervical spine without a concurrent increase in unidentified cervical spine injuries or serious adverse outcomes? Design: Matched pair cluster randomised trial. Setting: 12 emergency departments of teaching and community hospitals in Canada...
متن کاملCanadian C-spine rules require validation and appropriate application.
The Canadian C-spine rules were published in 2001 (Stiell et. al.). Essentially, they state that the presence of any of a number of high risk factors (age greater than 65, dangerous mechanism of injury, or paraesthesia in extremities) mandates cervical spine radiology. If a defined set of low risk factors, that allow safe assessment of range of motion, are present, patients are asked to rotate ...
متن کاملThe Canadian C-Spine Rule more accurately identified cervical-spine injury in trauma than the NEXUS Low-Risk Criteria.
متن کامل
Accuracy of the Canadian C-spine rule and NEXUS to screen for clinically important cervical spine injury in patients following blunt trauma: a systematic review.
BACKGROUND There is uncertainty about the optimal approach to screen for clinically important cervical spine (C-spine) injury following blunt trauma. We conducted a systematic review to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the Canadian C-spine rule and the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) criteria, 2 rules that are available to assist emergency physicians to assess t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Emergency Medicine Journal
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1472-0205', '1472-0213']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-210325